A Caution

November 8, 2009

The only legitimate function of government is to provide citizens with personal safety and protection of their property. While the state interferes to an ever increasing extent in the personal lives of everybody and passes ever more restrictive laws on the businesses that provide income, and goods by which we live our lives, it is repeatedly failing to do the job for which it exists.

A recent BBC enquiry revealed that in the east of England alone the police issued nearly 30,000 cautions for burglary, sex crimes and assaults in 2005/6. A caution is only given where there is sufficient evidence for a prosecution and yet in this large number of serious offences the police are choosing not to prosecute even though the offender has accepted their guilt.

The Home Office website makes a strong point about cannabis having been re-classified as a class B drug (despite the scientific evidence making it very clear that this was not justified) and that personal use of cannabis could result in a prison sentence of up to five years and fourteen years if you sell it. Using cannabis has some risk for the person doing it, although not as much as for some legal and prescription drugs, but it is not something that does harm to other people. Burglary, sex crimes and assault are violent crimes that traumatise victims and cause peoples lives to be seriously limited by fear.

We have more police in this country than we have ever had in our history and we also have more laws than ever before. The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police has said in today’s Sunday Times that the public are being let down by failures in the criminal justice system. Too many violent criminal and habitual re-offenders are not being dealt with effectively.

The public is worried by it and the police are well aware of it, but the government continues to fail to do its only proper job.

Our message must be clear. Stop telling us how to live our peaceful lives in our own way; stop spying on everything we do or say; stop taking most of our money away from us in taxes and then wasting it on failed bankers or stupid PC laws. Above all stop violent criminals from damaging our lives by properly enforcing the simple laws that have regulated our society for centuries and which you have now lost sight of.

Dangerous criminals must be taken off our streets and the rest of us must be left to live our lives.


Gordon Brown and Afghanistan

November 6, 2009

 

It is in matters where lives are daily being lost and placed at risk that we need the greatest political clarity about what we are doing and why.

 

The first thing I want to say is that the removal of the Taliban Government in 2001 was an entirely justified action. The Taliban were hosting Al Quaeda and facilitating their campaign of international terror which had culminated at that time in the murder of 3,000 people in the 9/11 attacks.

 

The criminal Taliban government with all of its disgusting oppression of women, ghastly executions and maimings had come about because of repeated international interference by world powers. There was particular responsibility by the USA and Pakistan and the previous involvement of Russia, but many nations also had a hand in it. None of this excuses or justifies the illegitimate Taliban government and its crimes.

 

Al Quaeda is a criminal organisation responsible for mass murder and terrorism. The claims of Bin Laden and his associates for religious justification are of no worth and provide no justification for their crimes. Mafia claims for the moral authority of their ‘family’ values or Somali pirates attempted justifications of ‘policing’ fishing waters in response to loss of livelihood to international fishing are in a similar league to the propaganda of Islamists. Al Quaeda is organised crime like the Mafia or piracy. It is entirely justified to bring these organised criminals to justice and to take measures to destroy their organisations. By the very nature of the threat, these actions have to be international.

 

Dealing with very dangerous crime originating in another country requires military action, but it is very different from a war. As soon as the language of a ‘war on terrorism’ was invoked by George W Bush the necessary action against Al Quaeda and its supporters was misdirected. In his speech today Gordon Brown has shown that he has not yet managed to disentangle the issues in his mind and his government will continue to fail to set clear objectives in Afghanistan which will result in the unnecessary loss of British and Afghan lives for no purpose.

 

The Karzai Government is deeply corrupt and its pretensions to democracy have been exposed as completely fraudulent. These are matters which should be of great concern to the Afghan people, but they are none of our business. It is not possible to impose functioning political systems or moral values with armies and weapons.

 

It is not our business to stop Afghan farmers growing poppies. I will not go into the stupidity of British drug laws, but heroin use in this country cannot be controlled by trying to reduce production in Afghanistan. The demand for drugs in Britain is a British issue which can only be addressed in Britain.

 

Afghanistan is a multi ethnic place divided by different language, tribal and religious affiliations. For well over a century it has not been effectively ruled by a single government from the centre and there is no likelihood that it will be in the foreseeable future. Whether this problem is resolved by allowing the country to separate into its regional groupings or to form some sort of federal or con-federal relationship is a matter for the Afghan people to work out without outside interference.

 

The immediate problem is obvious. Invading powers have destroyed the military, policing and infrastructure of the country. With immediate withdrawal of the western powers, Karzai’s corrupt state apparatus would probably fall quickly to insurgents. So what is the solution?

 

The coalition forces should immediately stop all non-military activity such as school and road building or the administration of elections. The Karzai government must be told to establish its legitimacy by creating an administration that has public support. That can only be done by negotiating with the people who hold power and influence throughout the country. Some of the people they will have to talk to will be armed and may have been fighting to remove foreign influence from the country. This is not the same as wishing to attack the USA or Britain or having delusions about setting up a worldwide Islamist caliphate.

 

The coalition military should be taken of the streets and withdrawn to defensible bases pending withdrawal. Training of Afghan police and army should be rapidly phased out. If the Afghan government want training for their state forces (and they most certainly need it) such training should be provided by commercial contractors. There are plenty of private companies in the United States, Britain, Russia and elsewhere which are mainly made up of ex military personnel and they would compete for this business.

 

The pursuit of criminals like Bin Laden, Mullah Omar and their associates must continue as must the destruction of terrorist training camps and elimination of the criminal infrastructure. This does not require mass troops on the ground. It can and should be done by increased intelligence work, special forces operations and precision attacks by missiles and pilotless drones on firmly identified terrorist targets.

 

Brown has dithered on most things as Prime Minister and Britain has been too eager to follow bad leads from America. Now is the time for clarity and decisiveness. Recognise that it is a mistake to try to export democracy or western attitudes to Afghanistan and pull out the ground troops rapidly. Re-state our determination to prevent terrorist murder on British streets by eliminating criminal organisations whether they are based in this country or elsewhere.


Drugs and the Law

November 1, 2009
The Home Secretary has sacked Professor David Nutt from his position as Chairman of the supposedly independent Drug Advisory Committee. The alleged reason was that Nutt was lobbying for a change in government policy when the reality is that the government insisted on re-classifying cannabis against the evidence presented by the experts and refuses to accept the expert advice on the proper handling of ecstasy.

The simple truth is that the government has no interest at all in professional advice. What it really wants is to be able to use the experts to justify the decisions that it is determined to take irrespective of where the truth may lie.

When cannabis was reduced from a class B to a class C drug in accordance with expert advice and with the support of police who wanted to concentrate on real crime there was not an increase in cannabis use as anti drug campaigners predicted. There was actually a reduction in cannabis use when it was regarded as a less serious offence. This should not be too much of a surprise. Forbidden things always have an attraction and if it is recognised as not being such a big deal, the excitement and pull reduces.

It is not sensible risk mental and physical wellbeing by harmful drug use. That applies to alcohol and tobacco as much as it does to the misuse of medicines or taking illegal, recreational drugs. The point is that humans have always done these things and no amount of laws will stop them. Masking it illegal to take certain drugs causes death, injury and serious ill health because the drug users do dangerous things like sharing needles and taking contaminated products supplied by the criminals who are the only source of the drug they want.

Illegailty also creates a vast amount of crime. This ranges from the international multi millionaires who produce the drugs to the street corner gangs who murder and maim to protect their territory. Very few societies have had the courage to leave drug users alone, but those who have tried, such as Holland and Portugal, have found enormous benefit from it.

It is impossible to stop people from trying to use escapist substances. The best way to minimise the harm and risk is to provide the free and prosperous society from which people do not need to try to escape. Our police should also be left to stop rape, violence, burglary and terrorism.

We should throw out a government that sacks people for telling the truth.


Working From Home

August 12, 2008

 

Working From Home

 

She leisurely rose at 11am.

No custom is ever around before then.

Strong coffee and chats

with mates on the phone.

A couple of fags, some toast

and a line.

An hour or two more

and she’ll feel just fine.

 

First job of the day,

get the ironing out.

Some slap on the face,

the right bra and pants.

Back from the window

she finds the right place.

 

Just after two, the telephone rings.

A time waster asking

the wrong sort of things.

An hour goes by

and a car slowly passes.

She irons again

the same pair of panties.

 

The car passes once more.

It parks and the bell rings.

Strong bargaining follows,

the product won’t fit.

The client requires a thing

that he can’t have.

Some late price adjustment

might clinch the deal.

No, she just cannot meet

the specialist need.

 

Four-o-clock turns.

Her regular weekly.

Bang on time,

a predictable job.

A routine half hour,

tediously easy.

Reliably bringing

a needed few quid.

 

At last the phone ringing.

A chance to earn something

“Yes I ‘m free.

Just come on round.”

Another quick line

for a bit of a boost.

The doorbell rings.

Time to earn a crust.

 

This guy, never seen before,

sent by a friend.

Wants a lot

for what he pays.

She can’t afford

to turn him down.

Must do her best

to please him.

 

Another quick line

to sharpen up.

It’s time when things get busy.

A packet of crisps

for the gnaw in her guts.

Can’t risk going out

to the shop.

 

Back at the iron,

the light set right,

a trickle of clients

comes by.

By one in the morning,

all movement is done.

She draws deep on a late cigarette.

Her boyfriend arrives

with much needed coke

and takes her,

so rough,

by the throat.

 

She hands him the cash,

which isn’t enough,

and he’s gone again

into the night.

 

The curtains are closed,

she drops on the couch.

Stinging from

the slap on her face

that he gave as he left

through the door.

An order was barked

to earn some more.

Stop wasting time on herself.

End of a home working day.


Chemistry

February 20, 2008

 

 

Doctor twisting that child’s brain with

Ritalin.

Numbing the neurotic’s anxiety with

Prozac.

Vanquishing a housewife’s mind with

Valium.

Killing some junkie’s cramps with

Methadone.

 

Goes home and relaxes with

Alcohol.

Sucks stress out with

Nicotine.

Chews the fat with

Khat.

Keeps sleep’s curt call away with

Caffeine.

 

He puffs secretly with

Cannabis.

Condemns the kids who rave with

Ecstasy.

Abominates abuses with

Amphetamine.

Curses cretins corrupted with

Cocaine.

Heaps hell on those haggard with

Heroin.

In fact, he’s full of

Shit

 


Legalise All Drugs

February 17, 2008

Legalise All Drugs – Richard Brunstrom

January 7, 2008

Richard Brunstrom, the Chief Constable of North Wales, has again called for the legalisation of all drugs. This is a courageous statement by Brunstrom and he should be congratulated.

Despite decades of attempts, many millions of pounds and repeated new laws and initiatives, recreational drug use is more widespread than ever and there is a huge crime industry around the illegal production, import and distribution of drugs. There is absolutely nothing that the government can do which will stop drug use and anyway it should be a matter of individual decision whether anybody wants to use them. It has nothing to do with the state and they should get out of it.

Brunstrom quite rightly points out that alcohol and tobacco are drugs that have very serious implications for health. Some illegal drugs, such as ecstasy, are very safe by comparison. It would be absolutely crazy to try to make the use of alcohol and tobacco illegal and there is no possible justification for prohibition of other recreational substances.

In one respect Brunstrom is wrong. He advocates the supply of drugs through state outlets. This is frankly ridiculous. All state enterprises are inefficient and there is no more reason to involve the state in this than there is in the sale of cigarettes or drink. Drug users should buy their supplies from regulated outlets in exactly the same way as they buy their beer and cigarettes.

Those who become addicted to drugs and want to overcome their addiction have a responsibility to deal with that themselves. Nicotine is very addictive, but a great many people overcome it when they are ready to do so. There is no justification whatever for free methedone programmes or any other sort of maintenance of drug addicts at the taxpayer’s expense.

Listen to Brunstrom. Stop the idiotic behaviour of arresting Pete Doherty and all the others. The only harm they do is to themselves and they are the only ones responsible for that. The real harm to society does not come from recreational drug use, it comes from the armed criminals who control the market so long as it is illegal and it comes from the massive burden on the taxpayer of imprisoning inadequate drug users and paying maillions for idiotic support and rehabilitation programmes that give away free drugs and useless counselling.

Follow the example of Portugal. Legalise all drugs now.


Adventure

January 4, 2008

There was a girl from Camden Town

came down to Leicester Square.

She set herself a target to

find her fortune there.

A sleazy chap moved up to her

and this is what he said.

“A girl like you could do real well

down here in the West End.”

The girl replied “you slimy creepI did not come for hire

I set myself to find a life

away from slum land mire.”

“A very sound and worthy chap

is all that I expect.

You naughty man to treat me so

and bring me disrespect.”

“Oh no.” He said. “I did not seekfor you to go astray.

I want to see you do real well

and get a guy some day.”

“But first, you need to hook him

to take him down the aisle.

So work for me just once or twice

to earn some cash, then play.”

“You see this lovely fifty note.

I’ll roll it nice and tight.

Just sniff the line of powder.

Life will be alright.”

“Good evening Miss. Who is this man

whose car you’e leaning in?

You’re the lady in the court last week

soliciting again.”

“He’s just a friend.” she slurs

and cries. “A friend that’s all. I swear.”

“You’ll know his name then won’t you luv.

And know his wife as well.”

“OK, OK. Just take me in.

As you will always do.

Take my money and send me back

to pay for gear, my pimp and you.”


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 61 other followers